Kant and the early moderns
ed. by Daniel Garber and Béatrice Longuenesse
- XV, 257 S. 23 cm
Includes bibliographical references and index
Introduction Daniel Garber and Béatrice Longuenesse Kant's "I think" versus Descartes' "I am a thing that thinks" Béatrice Longuenesse Descartes' "I am a thing that thinks" versus Kant's "I think" Jean-Marie Beyssade Kant's critique of the Leibnizian philosophy : contra the Leibnizians, but pro Leibniz Anja Jauernig What Leibniz really said? Daniel Garber Kant's transcendental idealism and the limits of knowledge : Kant's alternative to Locke's physiology Paul Guyer The "sensible object" and the "uncertain philosophical cause" Lisa Downing Kant's critique of Berkeley's concept of objectivity Dina Emundts Berkeley and Kant Kenneth P. Winkler Kant's Humean solution to Hume's problem Wayne Waxman Should Hume have been a transcendental idealist? Don Garrett.
Introduction / Daniel Garber and Béatrice Longuenesse -- Kant's "I think" versus Descartes' "I am a thing that thinks" / Béatrice Longuenesse -- Descartes' "I am a thing that thinks" versus Kant's "I think" / Jean-Marie Beyssade -- Kant's critique of the Leibnizian philosophy : contra the Leibnizians, but pro Leibniz / Anja Jauernig -- What Leibniz really said? / Daniel Garber -- Kant's transcendental idealism and the limits of knowledge : Kant's alternative to Locke's physiology / Paul Guyer -- The "sensible object" and the "uncertain philosophical cause" / Lisa Downing -- Kant's critique of Berkeley's concept of objectivity / Dina Emundts -- Berkeley and Kant / Kenneth P. Winkler -- Kant's Humean solution to Hume's problem / Wayne Waxman -- Should Hume have been a transcendental idealist? / Don Garrett