TY  - BOOK
AU  - Gauchet,Marcel
AU  - DeBevoise,M.B.
TI  - Robespierre: the man who divides us the most 
SN  - 9780691212944
AV  - DC146.R6 G3813 2022
U1  - 944.04/092B 23/eng/20211012
PY  - 2022///]
CY  - Princeton
PB  - Princeton University Press
KW  - Robespierre, Maximilien,
KW  - Revolutionaries
KW  - France
KW  - Biography
KW  - HISTORY / Europe / France
KW  - bisacsh
KW  - PHILOSOPHY / Political
KW  - Politics and government
KW  - 1789-1799
N1  - "First published in French under the title Robespierre: L'homme qui nous divise le plus by Marcel Gauchet © Editions Gallimard, 2018."; Includes bibliographical references (page 193) and index; Introduction. The Incorruptible and the Tyrant -- The Man of the Revolution of the Rights of Man -- I, the People -- From the Authority of Principles to the Struggle for Power -- Governing the Revolution: The Rule and the Exception -- Governing the Revolution: The Undiscoverable Foundation -- The Two Faces of the Revolution and Its Legacy
N2  - "Robespierre is arguably the most controversial and contradictory figure of the French Revolution. He still inspires more passionate debate than any other protagonist of those dramatic and violent events of the late eighteenth century, and he still retains both unconditional admirers as well as fierce critics. The fervor of those who defend the "incorruptible" is met with revulsion of by those invoke the bloodthirsty "tyrant". Robespierre, in fact, is the embodiment of the two competing memories of the Revolution, much as 1789 and 1793 still symbolize the two opposing faces of this foundational event: the glorious accession of liberty, on the one hand, and the excesses which terminated in the Terror, on the other. Only Robespierre is the link between the two. He championed the rights of the people in the Assembly and then through his Montagnard Convention provided the guillotine. In this extended essay, eminent French historian Marcel Gauchet reflects upon the insight that the contradictions of Robespierre were simply the contradictions of the French Revolution itself, in no small part because Robespierre was in his way the purest incarnation of the Revolution. He was neither the defender of the rights of man only later corrupted by power, nor the tyrant who betrayed the principles of the Revolution. He was both: the figure most associated with the founding of modern French democracy was also the first tyrant of that democracy. Gauchet argues that in Robespierre the transition from opposition to government was the embodiment of the tragedy inherent in the Revolution, as its own prophetic ideals were impossible to implement. To understand Robespierre, then, is really to understand the tragedy of modern democracy, for which the descent into tyranny is a perpetual danger"--
ER  -